Thursday, May 04, 2006

Pierce, Tamora. Protector of the Small: Squire

This isn't the first book in the series--this was all they had at the library--so I concede that I'm not getting the best introduction to Tamora Pierce.

At any rate, it's about a teenage girl who is also the first girl to be trained as a knight in a century. She faces various challenges and learns various lessons, which are pretty much what you would expect. My impression was of perfectly competent YA fantasy that unfortunately pushed my buttons until I was annoyed with it. The buttons:

1) For someone who's been reading Joanna Russ and Ursula LeGuin and James Tiptree since ninth grade, "Girls can do anything boys can" is about the least interesting, and most obvious, thing that can be said about sex and gender. That doesn't mean that I won't be interested in a book that's about the struggles of the only girl (page/squire/knight) in a world of men; I just want it to have some point beyond "Girls can do anything boys can." And boy, do I find myself annoyed with books where the protagonists magically adopt liberal modern western values, despite not living in a liberal modern western society, while the antagonists are prejudiced, old-fashioned bigots. Yes, okay, A Great and Terrible Beauty gave off a scent of that. But it certainly didn't reek of it like this does.

2) Must the author take a real-world society and culture and language and plunk them down in the middle of a fantasy world? Very distracting, for anyone who speaks Japanese. And does it have to be Japan, which has enough problems being stereotyped as sooo nifty and exotic? And do the Japanese people have to be from Japanese StereotypeLand, where no one ever shows a trace of emotion? And... if you really think you must do all this... can you at least get the Japanese right? Arigato goziemashita, indeed.

3) In what universe does an otherwise competent woman accept a romantic relationship that consists only of the guy kissing her and calling her annoyingly sappy names? ...Oh, right, this one. But the narrative never pauses to consider that this might be problematic. Love Interest Guy is so boring.

I think even if these buttons hadn't been pushed, "competent" is about the nicest thing I'd have to say for it; the pacing is all off, and it feels rather predictable, like it's going through the paces. It feels pushed in all different directions at once: here's a bit of romance, here's a bit of politics, here's a bit of warfare, here's a bit of training, and it doesn't ever really cohere or come together--which, granted, it what you might expect from a middle book in a series.

I'm told that this is decidedly not the best thing Tamora Pierce has written, and just from reading it I get the sense that she's capable of much better.

7 comments:

Jackie said...

Umm. I think that the Pierce quartets really were meant to be read as a whole. She says something along these lines in the author's note at the end of either Trickster's Choice or Trickster's Queen. Our copy is checked out, but if my rather dusty memory is correct, she thanks J.K. Rowling for teaching publishers that kids will read long books. Probably some of your issues would have been resolved if that had been the case when this quartet was published. That said, I totally love Pierce. But then, I'm obsessed with chronology and read them all in exacting order. I wonder about my reaction had I done otherwise. (If it makes you feel better, I was bored with the Circle books until the last one - note, I still read them all. I think I need a life.) Happy Blogging!

Leila said...

Tamora Pierce makes me yack, for varied (and plentiful) reasons.

Glad to know I'm not alone.

Mer said...

Squire made me stop reading Protector of the Small, although I'm still rather fond of First Test, the first book of that quartet. I have a lot of issues with Pierce on the whole, not the least of which is one of my special pet peeves - the "liberal modern western values" thing you mentioned (something that is interestingly enough not nearly as pronounced in her first quartet, although it has its own separate problems). However, she's still on my shelf for the same reason Mercedes Lackey is - in 8th and 9th grade I wanted to read escapist fiction about girl warriors and magical telepathic ponies and not about historically accurate value systems. And so I still have a certain sentimental attachment.

On the subject of historically accurate value systems, have you read Theresa Tomlinson's The Forestwife? It's an old favorite that I recently reread and was pleased to find held up well under several years of perspective and history classes. It put me somewhat in mind of Catherine, Called Birdy, if that's any indication.

(And while Googling for the title I just discovered there are two sequels I'd never heard of! Oh fresh new books. Oh riches.)

Since this comment is going to be disgustingly long anyway, I just want to adda quick thanks for all the reviews - I've been reading quite a selection of your recs and liking them a lot! And I recently returned from several months' study abroad in Japan so a lot of your comments are very familiar. ;)

purplezion said...

Um... Yeah. I really think you would enjoy her books much more if you read them in order. Maybe even go back to Alanna; the first adventure. But that way you would kind of have an idea where you are.

I personally didn't like Squire as much as the other books Tammy has written. It just wasn't as good.

As for Tamora Pierce books that ARE WORTH READING you should read Trickster's Choice and Trickster's Queen. They are her best books yet.

Have fun!

Virginia

P.S. Have you read any of Mercedes Lackey's books! Especially the Heralds of Valdemar? ABSOLUTELY FANTASTIC!!!!

Anonymous said...

i just want to point out that you probably shouldn't criticize tp before you're read all of her books. also, i dont kno why, i found cleon interesting. i think that she likes him because of the fact that she's never really been the kind of girl that anyone's attracted to, and so she feels unfeminine, so he helps her. i do admit that squire was not the best book that tamora pierce wrote, but other than that i can't find any real faults in it. and as for girl can do anythng boy can do, i do admit it is a bit overused. but i reall like kel, because she's not firey or over dramatic with her amibitions. also, it's not just like "i can do anything guys can do, i can like play basketball or something" its different, because she wants to be a knight. that said, i do agree alittle bit with some of your criticisms, but all in all i love pierce's books.

Emily said...

Okay, okay, guys, I won't judge Tamora Pierce too harshly before I read another book or two of hers. I promise. ;)

But, hey, I gotta be true to my own opinions.

Anonymous said...

I completely love the series Tamora
writes since they are energising and amusing. I personally think the alanna series was the best and the protecter of the small series next. Yes, some of you may think i'm gushing but i am true to my word. I love to read books and this series i read over and over because it makes women feel stronger when they read this book since the characters can do it of course we probably could if we tried hard enough